This House believes Egypt is becoming dangerously divided and intolerant

21/01/2013
Alexandria

Since the revolution, the Islamist parties have won every referendum and every election. But how much of the country actually supports them – and where are the faultlines between different sections of society? This debate was held for the first time in Alexandria, which has seen its own share of demonstrations and unrest. Is President Morsi a leader for all Egypt or a politician intent on maximising the power and influence of his own movement. Two years after Egypt’s revolution began an overwhelming majority at the New Arab Debates said the country was sinking under the weight of deepening political and religious divisions.

Two years after Egypt’s revolution began an overwhelming majority at a debate in Alexandria said the country was sinking under the weight of deepening political and religious divisions.

The mostly-young audience, attending a session of the New Arab Debates at the Main Hall of the world-famed Library of Alexandria, voted 83.3 percent in favour of the motion: ‘This House believes Egypt is becoming dangerously divided and intolerant’.

Speaking for the motion, lawyer Ghada Shahbender from the Egyptian Organization for Human Rights said she worried that the current Islamist-dominated administration was using the same tactics as former President Mubarak to stay in power.

“Egypt is divided between those who want prosperity and development for all, and those who want power, personal fame and gains only for themselves. Anyone who does not see that is the proverbial ostrich with its head buried deep in the sand,” she said.

Shahbender said several regressive forces had borrowed the “intolerant and extractive” Wahabi brand of Islam from Gulf Arab monarchies to continue with “the marginalization of youth and women, of anyone who opposes them or was born into a different religion”.

She added: “Once in power, they were more interested in the call to prayer in parliament than in a motion for a minimum wage.”

Opposing her, Tarek Shaalan, US-educated engineer and founding member of Al Watan, a conservative political party which adheres to Salafist principles, blamed divisions plaguing Egypt on the previous regime.

“Such discrimination has ended through the Islamist…We now have free and fair elections and we have the right to protest,” he said, adding that, in contrast to the situation under the old regime, veiled women could now work in public television and the state-run national airline. “The Islamic parties in this revolution are just like the Martin Luther King movement which ended (racial) discrimination in the USA,” he said, provoking a female member of the audience to protest.

In a hard-fought, combative debate, Shaalan repeatedly told the audience that they could send the Islamist parties packing at the next election if they didn’t live up to their promises.

There was applause, however, when a woman told him that most Egyptians had given President Mohammad Morsi and his government a chance, “but what we are seeing is a constitutional declaration that nobody agrees about and a constitution which is absolutely a mess. So these are things that are dividing the Egyptians.”

Audience vote

  • For: 83
  • Against: 17

Comments

Comments have been disabled.

Share this